🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager endured defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation and Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for playing too much that system. Bring in the process guy and then discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.